contact@scienceassistinternational.com

Journal of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (ISSN :2769-7029)

Journal Home » Instruction for Authors » Editorial Board » Articles
Articles Inpress Current Issue Archive
Submit Manuscript »
Journal of Anesthesia and Intensive Care

Volume 2, Issue 3 (2022)

Research Article - Open Access
Determination of Correct Size of Endotracheal Tube in Children by Ultrasonographic Measurement of Subglottic Diameter Versus Traditional Formula

1. Wailoo MP, Emery JL. Normal growth and development of the trachea. Thorax. 1982;37(8):584-587. 

2. Taylor C, Subaiya L, Corsino D. Pediatric cuffed endotracheal tubes: an evolution of care. Ochsner J. Spring 2011;11(1):52- 56. 

3. Davis D, Barbee L, Ririe D. Pediatric endotracheal tube selection: a comparison of age-based and height-based criteria. AANA J. 1998;66(3):299-303. 

4. Gupta K, Gupta PK, Rastogi B, Krishan A, Jain M, Garg G. Assessment of the subglottic region by ultrasonography for estimation of appropriate size endotracheal tube: A clinical prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2012;6(2):157-160.

 5. King BR, Baker MD, Braitman LE, Seidl-Friedman J, Schreiner MS. Endotracheal tube selection in children: a comparison of four methods. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22(3):530-534. 

6. Shih MH, Chung CY, Su BC, Hung CT, Wong SY, Wong TK. Accuracy of a new body length-based formula for predicting tracheal tube size in Chinese children. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31(3):276-280. 

7. Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier JP, Tranquart F, Sauvagnac X, Mercier C, et al. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):611-614. 

8. Turkistani A, Abdullah KM, Delvi B, Al-Mazroua KA. The ‘best fit’ endotracheal tube in children --comparison of four formulae. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2009;20(3):383-387. 

9. Schramm C, Knop J, Jensen K, Plaschke K. Role of ultrasound compared to age-related formulas for uncuffed endotracheal intubation in a pediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(8):781-786.

Volume 2, Issue 3 (2021)

Research Article - Open Access
Determination of Correct Size of Endotracheal Tube in Children by Ultrasonographic Measurement of Subglottic Diameter Versus Traditional Formula

1. Wailoo MP, Emery JL. Normal growth and development of the trachea. Thorax. 1982;37(8):584-587. 

2. Taylor C, Subaiya L, Corsino D. Pediatric cuffed endotracheal tubes: an evolution of care. Ochsner J. Spring 2011;11(1):52- 56. 

3. Davis D, Barbee L, Ririe D. Pediatric endotracheal tube selection: a comparison of age-based and height-based criteria. AANA J. 1998;66(3):299-303. 

4. Gupta K, Gupta PK, Rastogi B, Krishan A, Jain M, Garg G. Assessment of the subglottic region by ultrasonography for estimation of appropriate size endotracheal tube: A clinical prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2012;6(2):157-160. 

5. King BR, Baker MD, Braitman LE, Seidl-Friedman J, Schreiner MS. Endotracheal tube selection in children: a comparison of four methods. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22(3):530-534. 

6. Shih MH, Chung CY, Su BC, Hung CT, Wong SY, Wong TK. Accuracy of a new body length-based formula for predicting tracheal tube size in Chinese children. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31(3):276-280. 

7. Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier JP, Tranquart F, Sauvagnac X, Mercier C, et al. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):611-614. 

8. Turkistani A, Abdullah KM, Delvi B, Al-Mazroua KA. The ‘best fit’ endotracheal tube in children --comparison of four formulae. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2009;20(3):383-387. 

9. Schramm C, Knop J, Jensen K, Plaschke K. Role of ultrasound compared to age-related formulas for uncuffed endotracheal intubation in a pediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(8):781-786.